Talk:Cauldron II: The Pumpkin Strikes Back
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Xtzou in topic GA Review
![]() | Cauldron II: The Pumpkin Strikes Back has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Cauldron II: The Pumpkin Strikes Back/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 19:45, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
This is a nice little article. Very well done! I did a little copy editing. Please reverse any errors I may have introduced. Xtzou (Talk) 19:45, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality: Clearly and concisely written.
- B. MoS compliance: Complies with required elements of MOS
- A. Prose quality: Clearly and concisely written.
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources: Reliable sources
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources: Reliable sources
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects: Sets the context
- B. Focused: Remains focused on the topic
- A. Major aspects: Sets the context
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 19:47, 31 May 2010 (UTC)