Origin edit

Was this unit really date "from the European colonial times"? I was under the impression that it was a traditional Chinese unit. Ironfrost 12:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Malaya Origin edit

It may be true that its origin is 'Malaya', but the unit was widely used in South-East Asia, until the advent of the metric system. --Novelty (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'll just note edit

that no one in China actually calls this the "市斤" any more than Americans measure distances by "international miles". It's just the "jin" in both Chinese and in English expat use. Not sure how you'd go about proving that it's fully replaced "catty", however: too many other Jins are going to get in the way of the search results. — LlywelynII 14:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

This isn't edit

The PRIMARYTOPIC of "catty", though. Passive aggression is. — LlywelynII 14:52, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

About referring to Han characters as "symbols" edit

I changed the introduction, to try to clarify that 斤 is simply the Chinese name for this unit, read a jin in Chinese (or kin in Japanese, or similar in Korean). Several Chinese units, which were used (with varying values!) across the Sinosphere, in CJK, had Malay names, by which they were known in the West. I'm not sure the new wording is ideal, so welcome suggestions... Imaginatorium (talk) 13:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply