Talk:Catoctin Creek Distilling Company

Newsworthy

The Catoctin Creek Distilling Company wiki page should not be deleted. The company is the first legal distillery in Loudoun County since before Prohibition. The company is definitely newsworthy, having appeared in the Washington Post, several industry web site stories, and even on the NBC Nightly News. (See references section.) I see no reason why the wiki page should be deleted.

Neutral Point of View

There is no problem with neutrality of the article. Every single paragraph is provided in a neutral, dispassionate point of view--just the facts.

Scohar70 (talk) 18:10, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

You mean, both single paragraphs? Anyway, seems NPOV to me. Whether it is WP:N is another matter – adding refs to the Washington Post would be good. Si Trew (talk) 19:09, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

The other paragraphs were removed by another wiki user. However, I will add the Washington Post article as a reference. Scohar70 (talk) 19:46, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

I have read the Washington Post article you referenced and it is just a passing reference to the existence of your company - it is not significant enough for establishing notability. noq (talk) 20:00, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

What about the NBC Nightly News story? Scohar70 (talk) 20:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Article is neutral. Removed the COI. Argoblaster (talk) 10:19, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

August 15, 2010

Article was nominated for deletion with no reason provided. Suggest removing this deletion tag. Argoblaster (talk) 10:45, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Reason given at the following page: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catoctin Creek Distilling Company as shown on the afd notice. Your arguments for keeping the article should be made there noq (talk) 12:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Catoctin Creek Distilling Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.proof66.com/article_display.asp?id=94
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707131445/http://americancraftspirits.com/?p=1362 to http://americancraftspirits.com/?p=1362
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121018005545/http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&typ=bil&val=SB1249 to http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&typ=bil&val=SB1249
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121207184458/http://www.goodfoodawards.org/good-food-awards-finalists-2012/ to http://www.goodfoodawards.org/good-food-awards-finalists-2012/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100811000634/http://drinkingtheworld.com/2010/05/07/adi-2010-artisanal-whiskey-competition to http://drinkingtheworld.com/2010/05/07/adi-2010-artisanal-whiskey-competition
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120905045211/http://www.leesburg2day.com/news/loudoun/article_b8161444-05d2-11e1-bf58-001cc4c03286.html to http://www.leesburg2day.com/news/loudoun/article_b8161444-05d2-11e1-bf58-001cc4c03286.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101216065709/http://gardenandgun.com/viewAllPhotos?type=photo_gallery&nid=2018 to http://gardenandgun.com/viewAllPhotos?type=photo_gallery&nid=2018

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:31, 1 August 2017 (UTC)