Talk:Catherine of Pomerania, Countess Palatine of Neumarkt

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 161.52.190.124 in topic Birth year

Untitled edit

Wasn't she also know as Vratislava also before she was named Catherine?--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 18:51, 23 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Vratislava means the daughter of Vratislav. She was called Katarzyna Vratislava in Polish. SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:52, 23 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Translation edit

Someone should translate this source and add it to the article.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 03:09, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Done--Aciram (talk) 23:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catherine of Pomerania, Countess Palatine of Neumarkt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Birth year edit

The german version of the page states that she was likely born in 1384, not 1390. This seems likely as she was adopted in 1388, she can hardly have been adopted two years before her birth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.52.190.124 (talk) 08:42, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply