This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
The only reason this person is notable is her controversial comments regarding a conflict of interest in JAMA. The article currently neglects this entire topic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.7.216.153 (talk) 06:43, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
DeAngelis is the editor of JAMA, the first woman editor of JAMA, a former dean and professor at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine with over 100 scientific publications, and is notable only for "controversial comments?" MiRroar (talk) 18:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yes, the controversy over COI should be included, it made national headlines, her professorship has not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:Contributions/] ([[User talk:]) 18:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Her professorship, authorship, and journal editorship have all made national headlines. I have added numerous reliable sources, starting in 1984. There are many more, over a hundred I think. MiRroar (talk) 22:57, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
The disclosure controversy should be included, but it should be NPOV and have good sources not a blog. MiRroar (talk) 23:01, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}