This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
This is standard section name recommended in the school article guidelines. Nothing is gained by using the title 'Notable people', which is vague, when the list consists of only alumni. If there are notable faculty or staff at a later date then a separate section can be added for them. A mixed list leaves the reader to decipher whether a name is alumni, staff, faculty or simply doesn't belong. Gab4gab (talk) 13:04, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
It seems straight forward to me to call a list of notable alumni what it is. At the same time, given that the article is very short, it might be best to drop the notable section for now and mention Huey in the lead. Gab4gab (talk) 15:12, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
It should be noted that the essay mentioned above has zero weight. It was proposed as a guideline but failed to gain consensus. It should not be quoted and made to seem official, as if it were wikipedia policy or even established consensus. Even so, in this case, notable alumni is a most reasonable section heading (as is notable people). If there were, however, one notable alumni and one notable staff, it would seem wise to use a notable people heading, rather than fill the article with tiny sections.Jacona (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
