Talk:Carson Mounds

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 28 March 2015 by reviewer Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs).

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carson Mounds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402110733/http://www2.youseemore.com/carnegie/default.asp to http://www2.youseemore.com/carnegie/default.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Support the 2020 proposal to merge Carson Site to here; the same place is being described. Klbrain (talk) 09:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Support, although after looking at the other article, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better just to delete it (the other one, not this older, better referenced and better written one) rather than merging. The Carson Site article reads like a sixth graders history class essay, and at about a C- level at that. It is inaccurate and badly written, and doesn't seem to contain any real information not already in the Carson Mounds article. He iro 15:44, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Actually, redirecting it might be a better option, so per BOLD, I just did. He iro 15:52, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unexplained removal of "Stovall"

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An anonymous edit in 2018 (see here) changed the name of the site from "Carson-Montgomery-Stovall" to "Carson-Montgomery-" and removed another mention of the Stovall family. I'm tempted to revert the edit as unexplained content removal, but I don't have access to any of the sources for the "Carson-Montgomery-Stovall" name. Does anyone have a better idea of whether this edit was vandalism? SimLibrarian (talk) 09:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic