Talk:Caroline Primrose, Lady Dalmeny
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph of Caroline Primrose, Lady Dalmeny be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This page should not be speedy deleted because...
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because... Caroline Dalmeny is a member of the British Aristocracy, and therefore a Notable Person. In line with this, her husband and husbands extended family have wikipedia entries.
Wikipedia's own guidelines state:
Pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. If a subject is notable and the content can be replaced with text that complies with neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion. Note: An article which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion. "Promotion" does not necessarily mean commercial promotion: anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.
As Lady Dalmeny is a "Notable Person" please can you highlight which areas do not appear to be neutral, so that they can be altered/removed? As above wiki believes this is preferable to deletion. Thank you. Happylucia (talk) 12:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page is not unambiguously promotional, because... Lady Dalmeny is a member of the British Aristocracy, and therefore a person of interest.Happylucia (talk) 12:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Caroline, Lady Dalmeny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402175950/https://www.rusi.org/about/staff/associates/ref:B520D131E40215/ to https://www.rusi.org/about/staff/associates/ref:B520D131E40215/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402144937/https://www.rusi.org/analysis/authors/ref:B520D131E40215/ to https://www.rusi.org/analysis/authors/ref:B520D131E40215/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:02, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Caroline, Lady Dalmeny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120907083200/http://www.standrews.qc.ca/sas/docs/JOURNALJan2009final2.pdf to http://www.standrews.qc.ca/sas/docs/JOURNALJan2009final2.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.rusi.org/about/staff/associates/ref%3AB520D131E40215/
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.rusi.org/analysis/authors/ref%3AB520D131E40215/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Defence Expert? Notable? or just a socialite?
editThe ref provided does not support the clam that this woman is a defence expert. so I have removed it. My own research tells me that "Caroline Dalmeny worked as a political assistant for Michael Portillo when he was defence secretary"" - that does not make her a defence expert or even notable. Giano (talk) 17:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
There are lots of issues with this page, and it reads like an overly enhanced CV. The subject seems to have a lot of Google hits, but always as a past socialite rather than as a notable person - as the ex-wife as a peer's heir, I'm not sure she is notable. Giano (talk) 18:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)