This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Caroline Bird (archaeologist) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
a lot of good information in the career section, but more needs to be added to every other section as well. Maybe could add another section about early life as well, I know that some people are always interested in what the person they are reading about did before they became a well known archaeologist in this context.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The career and scientific contribution sections are fantastic. The only thing I would say is that it would be nice to have some specifics for what fieldwork she has done rather than just saying that she has experience. However, you have done this well when considering the scientific contributions section.
Regarding education - what levels were studied at each university?
In the opening section, since you first introduce Bird as an archaeologist, perhaps consider putting her specifically archaeological interests first rather than last.
Were you able to contact the author? Getting some biographical information might be a bonus here.
Otherwise, it's going well. Excellent formatting and ease of reading.
Puigr88 (talk) 00:35, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Every required section has been well identified within the context of your wikipedia article. The sections are logically laid out and present concise information on the female archaeologist. A comment that could be made is divulging a little deeper into the specific publications and excavations with more detail. Rather than just a heading that stated "scientific contributions", a section with the heading of a well-known excavation or publication may stimulate more interest in the said topic.
The article so far is very well-rounded, but more intriguing headers and sections may be a nice improvement.
Natalieandrewski (talk) 07:55, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Natalie Natalieandrewski (talk) 07:55, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletionedit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
.jpg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=logo}
