Talk:Carnegie College

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Comments edit

I'm concerned that the name change section is simply a press release or college advertising and as such it should be reworded or deleted in line with the deletion policy. Comments please? Quiet till stirred (talk) 17:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've edited this site, as the content sounded as if it had been added by the college concerned and it was subjective rather than factual and informative. Many comments were not verified or sourced. The site should give encyclopaedic information about the college only, and not opinion or pseudo advertising.Quiet till stirred (talk) 18:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carnegie College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:11, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply