Talk:Carmen Aristegui

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Aladoser in topic Is this neutral?

Is this neutral?

edit

The section titled as "Target of Censorship" is based on pure speculation and is clearly not neutral. It doesn't even have a truthful depiction on the whole incident. The mere title is against neutrality, it could easily be changed to "Alleged Censorship" which is far more neutral.

Later, the article reads "Mexico's most influential political figures, such as Andrés Manuel López Obrador, Roberto Madrazo Pintado, and several senators and governors frequently go on it to discuss current issues...". Who cited them as "Mexico's most influencial political figures"? I think maybe we should read something like "In her show she usually interviews prominent mexican politicians with focus on political analysis." In any case, I'll just put the POV-check template.

--189.205.103.207 (talk) 04:57, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have addressed the NPOV issues as best I can and some minor edits along the way. I am removing the NPOV tag as I believe the text is neutral at this point. --Mdukas (talk) 21:45, 5 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Aladoser (talk) 15:27, 11 July 2017 (UTC) This is neutral, but is poorly dated, it lacks of detailed dates, in chronographic order. It must have some hyperlinks in several parts. There is a part about Zavala which is poorly written and it lacks of sense and good understanding.Aladoser (talk) 15:27, 11 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Carmen Aristegui. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply