Talk:Carl Ramsauer

Untitled

Why is this a speedy delete? The subject was a respectable scientist of middling significance and the article has appropriate references.

andy 23:21, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

what to do

It is a perfectly appropriate article, and should not have been speedied--speedy is only for articles that are obviously NN. But the article must be wikified further in the style of other WP science articles., as follows:

• saying in the first sentence something to demonstrate notability, like "A.b. is an internationally-known professor of X at, winner of the XYZ prize and 10 honorary doctorates" , or A.B. is a notable authority on Whatever. She is ... (etc) (whatever applies best). Use the exact wording I recommend, including either the word "notable" or "internationally-known" or "nationally-known"; -- May sound silly, but that is what many people look for here. I already did this for you
• listing college degrees with university and year --
• listing important awards, with year
• listing important memberships and offices held
• listing books published as formal references style: Author, title, Publisher, year ISBN if possible.
• listing some major published papers, say how many total. State the importance the journals are. Say how many other papers cited them. For this period, the only source for this is Science Citation Index complete back to 1900. ; if you do not have this available, let me know & I will add this information

and, most important, giving additional 3rd party sources. Otherwise, there will be a certain amount of uncertainity whether you have followed your one source too closely.

These is, very unfortunately, some prejudice against people from the academic world. Specially ones not in google. DGG 00:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carl Ramsauer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928084348/http://www.pro-physik.de/Phy/leadArticle.do;jsessionid=C24527E1DE245A9F84BA1C95702E5D7C?mid=4&laid=4663 to http://www.pro-physik.de/Phy/leadArticle.do;jsessionid=C24527E1DE245A9F84BA1C95702E5D7C?mid=4&laid=4663

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)