This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Carl Hilsenberg is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The facts that this person has a recognised botanical abbreviation, and is the author of a valid zoological specific epithet, are sufficient to establish notability. Maias (talk) 07:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I can understand the "notablility" of a botanical name, but that in mind is no where near enough for this article to remain. Simply having a botanical abbreviation is not enough to make the person, nor this page, acceptable to remain here. By all means, pull the tag if you would like to, but really, with no references, no sources other than said abbreviation, this seriously needs to come down.--EmperorofPeopleEverywhere (talk) 07:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
