This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Colombia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Colombia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ColombiaWikipedia:WikiProject ColombiaTemplate:WikiProject ColombiaColombia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The page, the result of my hard work and referenced with 7 independent reliable sources, has been tagged by User redsox as "needing more references". No reason has been given, no discussion started, no specifics.
The Maintenance page states "3 - If it reasonably appears that the template did not belong when placed or was added in error (discussing the matter with the original placer of the template is advised, though if the user is no longer active this becomes moot; however, if the issue appears contentious, seek consensus on the talk page)"
it is completely unfair that someone not familiar with the subject can just jump in and place an ugly tag without discussing it first and that the person who did the hard work needs to seek "consensus".
as long as there are no specifics given, this tag is useless. "Citation needed" tags are useful and justified when it's about things that are obviously ground for it. If in an article about let's say Donald Trump is said that "he grew up in a poor family" then the Citation needed tag is justified. Here there's no specifics given whatsoever and even after a couple of reverts the placer of the tag refuses to state why and where "additional sources" would be needed. Without those specifics the tag becomes irrelevant.
