Talk:Caritas in veritate

Towards elevating this article to GA status.

Its almost impossible to over emphasise the impact this encyclical has had. At the top of the reception section there are sources showing the impact on top political and business leaders, its still being widely discussed at high level meetings today, for example it came up at a meeting I was at with Lord Turner of the FSA last month. The Financial Times sources suggest the encyclical may have helped secure an extra 5 billion for the fight against hunger, and this is just the tip of the iceberg. A year back it was looking like the best hope for building a fairer world where even the poorest can benefit from prosperity was the resurgence in Keynesian economics, but that movement has now been largely neutralised and much of the action has shifted to the spiritual dimension. As one of the most significant recent examples of religion influencing men and women in high office to work together for the common good, it would be great if we could get this to GA status!

Possibly the reception section could be expanded to about 5 times its current size. Theres probably enough on the reaction of political & business leaders for now, but we could do with better sources for the reaction from Catholics, Protestants, Muslims and the general reaction from secular commentators. Probably we should report on what Hindus are saying, and have a reaction from the NGO sector. Maybe we could have reactions by each of the five continents.

Most of the above reaction should be positive, so once its added in we could have more criticism. I think the most hard hitting and insightful critique is the one from Irish Times, but we could also add more about the encyclicals position on contraception.FeydHuxtable (talk) 20:40, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

On the 1 Aug 2010 re-write

To the IP editor who re-wrote the Synopsis on 1st August. Thanks for your contribution, but unfortunealy many of the sentences you added seem to have been copied direct from the official Vatican Summary. I've reverted much of your changes, and added an external link to the summary instead. Theres no reason why you cant make some minor changes, but please try to avoid large scale copying from other websites. FeydHuxtable (talk) 13:45, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Caritas in Veritate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090303204811/http://www.vanthuanobservatory.org:80/p_en/news.php?id_news=689 to http://www.vanthuanobservatory.org/p_en/news.php?id_news=689

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Caritas in Veritate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090513040950/http://www.zenit.org:80/article-24974?l=english to http://zenit.org/article-24974?l=english
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090904214617/http://www.zenit.org:80/article-26706?l=english to http://www.zenit.org/article-26706?l=english
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131002043426/http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_lt.html to http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_lt.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0805907.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.politicaltheology.com/ojs/index.php/PT/announcement/view/39

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC)