Talk:Cardiolipin

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

Chriality - the image shows a symmetrical molecule, which means that each glycerol group has opposite chirality - this seems unlikely to me

Fixed reference 12, the doi was incorrect Silasmellor (talk) 16:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Chirality - I think it has 2-fold rotational symmetry, not mirror symmetry. Thus the two glycerols superimpose and have the same chirality. On the other hand th central glycerol has its chiral carbon on the axis, so here it is mirror symmetry. Eaberry (talk) 02:30, 11 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

This article needs to be cleaned up. Esp the section about apoptosis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.9.12.243 (talk) 21:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC) Agreed - these are proposed theories, highly contraversial in the field.Reply

_______________

I think the cardiolipin is made of two fosfatidic acids connected by a glycerol instead of two phosphatidylglycerols. The cardiolipin would have four molecules of glycerol in the second case, but it has only three. Where is the glycerol of the polar head of the second phosphatidylglycerol? In animals the last step of the biosynthesis pathway is a reaction between a phosphatidylglycerol and a diacilglycerol (carried by CDP as CDP-DAG). I mean in the reaction there is just one molecule of phosphatidylglycerol. In bacteria the reaction is between two phosphatidylhglycerols but a glycerol is released, so the resultant cardiolipin cannot be chemically described as two linked phosphatidylglycerols. Am I wrong? Miguelferig (talk) 22:26, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
I agree- the original author obviously meant phosphatidic acid where he wrote phosphatidyl glycerol. Phosphatidylglycerol has two glycerol moieties, so if they are linked by a "central glycerol backbone", there would be five, not three! I will make this long-overdue correction. Eaberry (talk) 02:18, 11 September 2014 (UTC) __________________Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cardiolipin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply