Talk:Cara Mía Theatre Company
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. Wikipedians in Dallas may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
[Untitled] edit
Excellent! Keep working on your article ahead of our peer editing work on May 17th. I'm looking forward to what you put together (Deferred Action and its tour is likely a great place to focus). Thea365Instructor (talk) 23:27, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Farrah's Peer Review edit
I would love to know more about the company's founding before their current executive director came in and, if relevant, how their goals/mission/approach changed. I think it would be good to have some quotes from the company in terms of the exact wording for their mission statement or other information that is important to the way they work. How are they trying to expand/what are they moving towards? What does the staff look like at the company? How do they spend their money? Guidestar is a great resource to find out budget information. I think it would be valuable to know more in-depth about the productions they have put on and the work that they do with young people. I think you have a great lead section, it is simple and gives a nice summary of what the company is about and reflects what you expand on in the article. It will definitely be beneficial to link your references so readers can do more of their own research.Farrahsklar (talk) 18:15, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Felicia's Peer Review edit
Something to keep in mind is to be careful of using qualitative statements (e.g. "powerful" performance) so that your article can appear as neutral and unbiased as possible. I would also say that it might be helpful to review wikipedia citations. I think they prefer if you use their citation machine so that there are the numbered references that are linked in the article as opposed to the style you're using now. Overall, great job! Felicia Oduh (talk) 18:40, 17 May 2018 (UTC)