Talk:Cantabrian mythology

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cantabrian mythology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080512003649/http://www.dgmontes.org/arboles.htm to http://www.dgmontes.org/arboles.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.eldiariomontanes.es/prensa/20070324/cantabria/requiem-tejo-mariomontanes.es/prensa/20070324/cantabria/requem-tejo-milenario-lebena_20070324.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070203090029/http://www.funjdiaz.net:80/folklore/pdf/292.pdf to http://www.funjdiaz.net/folklore/pdf/292.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070413232156/http://www.cantabriajoven.com:80/mitologia/ to http://www.cantabriajoven.com/mitologia

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cantabrian mythology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080512003649/http://www.dgmontes.org/arboles.htm to http://www.dgmontes.org/arboles.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:01, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Copy edit

Managed to at least get this article coherent and reduce the weird turns of phrase/generally unencyclopedic language. However it still has quite a few problems. There are a lot of unsupported statements, and it looks like there may be two articles here, one on celto-romanic mythology which could probably be moved to the appropriate already existing article, and another one about cantabrian folklore, which have been glued together with what could be original research. I hate to leave a mess for someone else to fix up, but I don't have enough in depth knowledge of the subject, and a lot of the sources are in Spanish, so I cant work out if it can be fixed, or needs to separate.Curdle (talk) 12:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC)