Talk:Canon law of the Catholic Church

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Canon law (Catholic Church). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080220062727/http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM to http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070228185158/http://www.vatican.va:80/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_jp-ii_apc_25011983_sacrae-disciplinae-leges_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_jp-ii_apc_25011983_sacrae-disciplinae-leges_en.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080220062727/http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM to http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

oldest continuously functioning legal system in the West

The source for this statement CanonLaw.info doesn't seem reliable nor unbiased. I don't have access to the other source provided in the lede. My main concern is that "continuously functioning" is vague. Pythagimedes (talk) 17:04, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

"Medicine and Canon Law" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Medicine and Canon Law and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Medicine and Canon Law until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

"Consent (in Canon Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Consent (in Canon Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Consent (in Canon Law) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

"Compromise (in Canon Law)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Compromise (in Canon Law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Compromise (in Canon Law) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)