Talk:Cannabis use disorders

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles

Cannabis Mid‑importance

	Cannabis portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"Cannabis use disorder" is just a scary way to say "being high." I mean really... Disorder? Come on. Being high is no more a disorder than is being happy. It's like saying, "Some of the main alcohol use disorders (AUD) include mental and physical impairment, aggression, and reduced inhibition. Over 98% of college students have reported experiencing alcohol use disorders last weekend."

This can be merged into the Cannabis (drug) article, its so controversial it may not stay there and certainly not in such a POV way. No mention of controversy or another opinion. IMO hiding this away in a tiny little article is wildly inappropriate. Thanks, SqueakBox talk 17:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic