This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article seems to contradict itself a couple of times.
"Canis armbrusteri is the oldest member of lupus" followed by "larger and heavier than its older and longer living cousin, Canis lupus."
"Canis armbrusteri did give rise to C. dirus (Dire Wolf)" followed by "Armbruster's Wolf is considered a sister species of the Dire Wolf"
Also, how could C. ambrusteri be a member of a different species, C. lupus? Brem1964 (talk) 07:11, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Should this species also be moved into a new genus, since it is now thought that this species could also belong to the ancient dire wolf lineage? 2001:1970:48AA:8100:40F5:7D8B:DCFF:3F8 (talk) 04:26, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Did the researchers actually rename this wolf with the new genus name? If not, then no. William Harris (talk) 05:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply