 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Drmies: I do think that the sentence on the counter-intuitive nature of cangiante ought to be restored. The whole heart of the matter is that brightness information is more important than color information in viewing and understanding a scene. Cangiante is not just an obscure painting term of 500 years ago. The visual concerns of the Renaissance artists are exactly the concerns we have today whether we're using Painter XI or Photoshop. By removing the sentence you take out the entire point of the article.
visitor: Also, do try and clarify the issue with Unione, so far I have yet to find anything enlightening on the Internet and Wikipedia seems to offer next to nothing when it comes to it, particularly because the count starts with it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.27.68.1 (talk) 19:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Wers: I have concerns about the fact that all the entries on the "canonical painting styles" are citing the same specific person exclusively, and I didn't see any incredible evidence to suggest that it's "widely accepted." I feel that it should be flagged as needing more citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9004:600:4214:0:0:0:1180 (talk) 14:01, 8 March 2024 (UTC)