Talk:Candidates of the 1917 Victorian state election

Australia: Victoria / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Candidates of the 1917 Victorian state election is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Nationalist mess edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The factional Nationalist designations here are very, very doubtful, and I hope people can help sort them out. They follow Psephos, which in turn follows the Argus (more or less), but I think the Argus was very lazy and put most Nationalist candidates just in the "Nationalist" category without distinguishing them. The Age did not distinguish at all, but I agree with Psephos that it would be perverse to list the government and those who defeated them in the same column. Close work should be done on every Nationalist candidate; I am not at all sure of some of the sitting member designations either. I hope to do some of this at some point but would appreciate any help! Frickeg (talk) 04:15, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Congrats for even trying with this one, and I really like your approach in designing a table for the weird situation. I'll see if I can get around to doing Trove searches on everyone, but if I forget feel free to remind me down the track some. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic