Talk:Canadian Cadet Organizations

How much difference is there between the elements?

From the way the articles about army cadets, air cadets, and sea cadets are written, they sound like they are almost identical. It sounds like they all focus on the same leadership and outdoors skills with only the occasional reference to element-specific work. If they really are this similar, maybe the three articles should be merged into one. If they are really different, there should be way more focus on their differences. --24.108.210.111 (talk) 09:17, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

I agree. I know that we (army) do marksmanship, while the air get pilot's training, and sea get to learn how to drive a boat, but besides that, the different uniforms/ranks/slightly different drill, we're actually the same thing. I say merge it into this article. 70.67.14.234 (talk) 15:34, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

They programs may be similar in some basic training, but each still has their own history and traditions which if merged would be lost or not enough detail paid to them, instead we need to add more history and traditions into to them. The sea cadets still carry out many of the old navy traditions (ie. Navy Mess Dinners, toasting to the Queen etc). The army cadets share histories with the affiliated reserve regiment and will carry many of their traditions as well as they often will have more support from the local reserve in the manner of volunteers from the regiment, equipment and specialty regiment training. The air cadets have some of the more intensive specialty training with the gliders and air traffic controller training. Each carries their own rank structure which predates the merging of the Armed Forces of Canada. Once again to merge these articles would be a great dis-service to the cadet movement as there is alot more to each of the services then the training alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcmatter (talk • contribs) 15:08, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Sections on Budget and Sexual Abuse - include or remove

The discussion is taking place on the Army Cadets talk page please contribute there. That page was selected as representative of all the articles affected. Fiddle Faddle 18:06, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Canadian Cadet Organizations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070109033024/http://www.cadets.ca/directory-repertoire/intro_e.asp to http://www.cadets.ca/directory-repertoire/intro_e.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070109033024/http://www.cadets.ca/directory-repertoire/intro_e.asp to http://www.cadets.ca/directory-repertoire/intro_e.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:18, 30 July 2017 (UTC)