Talk:Can You Hear Me? (Doctors)/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by DarkGlow in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 17:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Basic stuff and comments edit

  Done Chompy Ace 23:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Remove the link to "List of Doctors episodes" per the episode template.   DoneDarkGlow () 18:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • The following episode, "Up the Wall", doesn't need a reference.
  Done Chompy Ace 22:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Plot and cast edit

  • Plot section doesn't need a reference per MOS:TVPLOT.
  Done Chompy Ace 22:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Everything else in these two sections looks good.
  Done Chompy Ace 22:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Production edit

  • The 3rd and 4th paragraphs in this section have only one reference, which links to an official website that doesn't cover anything from either paragraph. There are only two options here: (1) Remove the content or (2) add references from where the content is provided.
  Done Chompy Ace 23:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • This is a very large section, so it should be reworded and divided into unique subsections, such as "Development", "Writing", and "Filming".
  Done Chompy Ace 23:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • The quote between "Lloyd stated that the cast enjoyed filming the episode" and "and that they were pleased" is unnecessary, so it should be removed.
  Done Chompy Ace 23:04, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "Doctors take an annual transmission break during the summer to accommodate the BBC's coverage of sport ceremonies and other daytime dramas, which typically starts in late June, but due to production on set being suspended, the transmission break began after the episode aired on 12 June 2020." --> "Due to production on set being suspended, the annual transmission break taken by Doctors during the summer began later than scheduled after the episode aired on 12 June 2020."
  Done Chompy Ace 23:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Italicize the use of the show Doctors.   DoneDarkGlow () 23:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Move the sentence "The Doctors Twitter account shared a photograph of cast member Elisabeth Dermot Walsh holding a clapperboard stating that her scenes in the episode had been filmed using an iPhone X" to the filming subsection.
  Done Chompy Ace 23:30, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Remove "I'm incredibly proud of the work everyone has put into this episode, especially our brilliant cast who have had to learn new skills, while still giving outstanding performances" as it's unnecessary and the quote is already too long.
  Done Chompy Ace 23:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Additionally, there's a lot of filming information that is found in #Development, so I'm going to put this review on hold, and give you two a maximum of a week to fix #Production.   DoneDarkGlow () 23:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reception edit

  • To not end the article on a run-on-sentence, I would remove the rest of the sentence following "ITU doctors and nurses are facing", so the article ends with the sentence: "An ITU nurse said that the episode was well written, and that it accurately portrayed the pressures and struggles that the ITU doctors and nurses are facing worldwide."
  Done Chompy Ace 22:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.