Wikipedia

Talk:Campaign to Defend the Constitution

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Making this entry NPOV

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

OK, calm down, it's just an entry. Yes it is too much like an ad, but Defcon deserves to have an entry. How about editing the text rather than burying the page in tags?--Cberlet 20:50, 13 December 2006 (UTC) (aka Chip Berlet, Defcon board member)Reply

I've "buried" nothing in tags.

Yes it is too much like an ad...

Hence, the {{advert}} tag.

...Defcon deserves to have an entry

Why? For its charming good looks? Hence, the {{notability}} tag.

How about editing the text

Not my field, and not my job to clean up someone else's ad copy (see second point above), hence my note to you. My first impulse was to slap a richly deserved {{db-spam}} tag on it, but I was doing you a favor by notifying you first. --Calton | Talk 23:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Wow, what an unhelpful defensive reaction and nasty response. I just spent 20 minutes researching and helping rewrite this entry. This type of arrogant and self-righteous attack is not useful, and is very offensive to me. I appreciated your notice, and went to work the first chance I got. You should apologize to every editor that has just worked on this article for the past hour to make it better. --Cberlet 23:59, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Wow, what an unhelpful defensive reaction and nasty response. Speak for yourself. "Bury in tags"? "do it yourself"? "deserves to have an entry"?
This type of arrogant and self-righteous attack is not useful, and is very offensive to me. Really? Then try to avoid it yourself.
You should apologize to every editor that has just worked on this article for the past hour to make it better. No. You should thank me for letting you save an obvious press-release-disguised-as-an-article instead of having it sent it immmediately to the bit bucket. You have a cause to promote: fine, but it doesn't give you a pass on Wikipedia standards, mores, and procedures, no matter how righteous your cause. So don't try to sell me on the martyr complex, because I'm not buying. --Calton | Talk 00:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much for proving my point better than I ever could. I honestly appreciate it.You have saved me so much work. Congratulations!--Cberlet 03:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
The Pee Wee Herman "I meant to do that!" defense is a non-starter, also. If you don't have an actual response, don't insult my intelligence by pretending you do. Try using some of your crack investigative journalist skills to find who, exactly, notified you to come save this article, and what that implies. Let me know when you've solved that mystery, or if you need a bigger hint. --Calton | Talk 12:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Good Job

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I had the same concerns as Calton but I really feel as if this article sounds encyclopedic now. Kudos to the editors who have made it so. Please continue to expand and improve it. Next task for someone, I imagine, would be to write articles for the redlinked people in it, or if they are not otherwise notable, to change them to unlinked. MKoltnow 19:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Organization pretty much defunct

edit

Web page is dead and blog is "taking a break" for lack of funding. I reflected that on the page, but feel free to improve the language. Carol Moore 15:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Carolmooredc {talk}

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Campaign to Defend the Constitution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Campaign to Defend the Constitution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Campaign to Defend the Constitution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Campaign_to_Defend_the_Constitution&oldid=1245642826"