Talk:Camp Atterbury-Muscatatuck
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Camp Atterbury-Muscatatuck article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Could we get some numbers? edit
Could someone get some accurate numbers on how many people have been mobilized at this installation?
Also then number of people the died in Europe from this post is not relevant to this post. Bruce R. Jones 18:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Go to the installation website. This number will change until we stop deploying troops out of CAJMTC. Caisson 06 (talk) 19:01, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Improper Edits (Copyrite Violation ) edit
US Government-produced material is generally not subject to copyright. See Work of the US government. The MUTC website (.mil) was properly credited as the source in the instance I reverted today. Caisson 06 (talk) 20:52, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for your contributions and I see your reasoning. Although the text is not copyrighted, I would like to remind you that Wikipedia writes original articles, not entries just copied from another site. Paraphrasing of this information would be appreciated. Thanks, Reywas92Talk 22:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Muscatatuck Urban Training Center deserves it's own entry edit
Any reason not to create one?93.96.148.42 (talk) 00:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Bakalar Air Base edit
Need mention of and link or headnote to airfield on this installation, later Bakalar AFB Lineagegeek (talk) 18:59, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
- Added it to a "See also" section Rosalina523 (talk) 22:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Camp Atterbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.campatterbury.in.ng.mil/AboutUs/CampAtterburyHistory/tabid/1591/Default.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722211753/http://www.mutc.in.ng.mil/HOME/tabid/56/Default.aspx to http://www.mutc.in.ng.mil/HOME/tabid/56/Default.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)