Talk:Camelford/Archive 1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Archive 1

Camelford water contamination incident

The Camelford water contamination incident - sometimes known as the Lowermoor incident - has been controversial for twenty years. New health evidence, and new insight into the motives of the various organisations involved, is still coming to light. I think that we should have a big separate article on it. It needs to be written with care, because it is still controversial. However, I don't think that I have the energy to author it from scratch at this time, Starting with reading the 200 pages of the latest government enquiry. All power to anyone who does! Emrys2 08:00, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Well, looking at it, some years later, nobody has, and that article remains short and lacking in detail. If nobody's going to tackle this, I propose merging it here until somebody does. For one thing, there is in some cases, more detail in this article than that. A redirect would be OK, of course. Rodhullandemu 22:09, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
I am currently updating this article at Camelford water pollution incident and could do with some help. I hope you don't mind I have removed the merge proposal as it's clearly notable outside the context of Camelford and now already too big to be a subsection --Pontificalibus (talk) 16:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Camelford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Camelford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 29 July 2017 (UTC)