Is there a more specific name that will work for this article? At the very least, it should be renamed to Camelback potential, but I'll wait for other feedback before any renames. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
- Definitely move it to your suggestion, or I can if you don't have that bit. I do find it a bit amusing that we have to fix the camel casing on this article in particular... Maury Markowitz (talk) 19:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
- Hi, @Maury Markowitz and Power~enwiki: I moved it as suggested because that's complying with guideline on article titles WP:NCCAPS, and I don't think anybody can object with superior argument as per as the previous capitalization concern — Ammarpad (talk) 11:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
