 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Name
editHaving read this page whilst seeking correct identification for this plant, I made further checks and WCSP (World Checklist for Selected Plants) confirm that the accepted name is still C.pallidus. M.pallida is still listed as a Synonym. The confirmation of this is the reference: [1] Additionally to that, I checked with the APG website: [2] and whilst they were not specific, they did not mention any significant changes to Callistemon and Melaleuca but they did cite another article by Edwards et al [3] which as the title suggests that there may need to be changes to this taxon. Whilst I confess I have not read the article in question, the original reviser stated that the 2006 paper by Craven proposes a change only. Also, having read Plantdrew's revision note, where he confesses that most sources still place it in Callistemon, I think that is sufficient to confirm that the revision be undone.
- ^ Govaerts, R., Sobral, N., Ashton, P., Barrie, F., Holst, B.K., Landrum, L.L., Matsumoto, K., Fernanda Mazine, F., Nic Lughadha, E., Proença, C. & al. (2008). World Checklist of Myrtaceae: 1-455. Kew Publishing, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
- ^ Stevens, P. F. (2001 onwards). Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 12, July 2012 [and more or less continuously updated since].
- ^ Edwards, R. D. [et al. 2010], Craven, L. A., Crisp, M. D., & Cook, L. G. 2010. Melaleuca revisited: cpDNA and morphological data confirm that Melaleuca L. is not monophyletic. Taxon 59: 744-754
Sfb dot com (talk) 22:47, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
- Moved to Callistemon pallidus.--Melburnian (talk) 05:57, 29 June 2013 (UTC)