Talk:Californium/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: FREYWA 05:49, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

After the success of beryllium (see here), I am now going to review californium. This should go without a hitch or else you're fired! FREYWA 05:49, 25 April 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

The article is decent, but one last thing to do before I do the GA ritual.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   You have to watch out for the punctuation! For example: Applications -> 3rd paragraph -> end: no full stop at end of quotation.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments

I'm now going through the article and fixing up all the punctuation errors...anybody who finds those I missed, feel free to correct them too. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 10:29, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Done, I guess. Article passed GA. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 13:34, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm really quite surprised myself that this took so short a time...! We should have another peer review (if there isn't one started already) before trying for FA again. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 13:36, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

You know, like what happened with fluorine. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 13:47, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

This is largely because nobody seems to have commented during this review. (With hindsight, I should've alerted Nergaal.) Lanthanum-138 (talk) 13:50, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

A second PR is not needed. I'll make a few more changes, mainly organizational, and then submit to FAC this weekend. --mav (reviews needed) 23:02, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Ah, I see all that discussion above. Hope it gets through FAC this time! Lanthanum-138 (talk) 11:05, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Actually, I want to wait until the Fluorine FAC is done or almost certain to pass. --mav (reviews needed) 01:22, 10 May 2011 (UTC)