Talk:California State Route 76/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Admrboltz in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Admrboltz (talk · contribs) 00:38, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

RD

History

Major intersections

  • Looks good to me.

References

  • Theres been talks on recent FACs on discouraging the use of {{reflist|2}} and using {{reflist|30em}} instead.
  • Ref 3: Thomas Brothers (2009). San Diego County Street Atlas (Map). - Can we get an OCLC or ISBN for this source?
  • First instances of items in your references should be wikilinked (e.g. Ca State Legislature, Caltrans, FHWA, etc.
  • I-805 has OCLC links for all the newspapers, if this is going to ACR next, I'd suggest getting them in sooner than later.

External links

All done. --Rschen7754 21:44, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Passing article as the External Links and References section are not part of the GA Criterion. --AdmrBoltz 21:47, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply