Talk:California State Route 60
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Kevon kevono in topic Viewpoint Evaluation
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the California State Route 60 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Viewpoint Evaluation edit
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
The History is very overrepresented, most of the article is mentioning the history of the Route 60. Underrepresentation can be argued amongst the information on the actual planning and engineering of the infrastructure. Such as the information on the actual plan, science, and funding of the project.
Tonylopez3 (talk) 22:51, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Tonylopez3
- I think it’s, to some extent, fine because the construction of the route isn’t significant compared to the route history itself. Kevon kevono (talk) 03:59, 22 April 2018 (UTC)