Talk:Caenagnathoidea

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge with Oviraptorosauria edit

Latest comment: 6 days ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion no support to avoid or dispute the merge. A Cynical Idealist (talk) 05:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support: This article does not contain any relevant unique information because only a few taxa are within oviraptorosauria that are excluded from caenagnathoidea. Internal taxonomy of oviraptorosaurs has been controversial, as is stated in this article, so the exact makeup of this taxon is uncertain and may be subject to change in the near future (e.g. the inclusion of Caudipteryx or Avimimus). Any new information that could be added to expand this page would be equally applicable to the parent taxon (oviraptorosauria), so the existence of this article is completely superfluous. In fact, some of the text for the intro paragraph is copy and pasted from the other article. Therefore, I propose this page be merged into Oviraptorosauria and Caenagnathoidea be left as a redirect. --A Cynical Idealist (talk) 19:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Note this article has also been invoked as part of a large merge prposal discussion at WT:DINO. LittleLazyLass (Talk | Contributions) 21:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic