Talk:Cadillac Williams
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Academic controversy
editI really think issues addressed in this reversion could better have been addressed by better sourcing and more faithfully citing the facts, so that's what I've tried to do. The previous editor's summary of the NYT article was certainly POV. I've tried to provide a fairer summary of the facts as they can be ascertained by publicly available sources; unfortunately the NYT article is no longer free, but I provided the link regardless. I feel pretty strongly that this material is relevant and encyclopedic, but I'm happy to work with consensus to get an NPOV summary of the facts of the case. - PhilipR 04:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- The section still has a factual error regarding when Williams took the courses in question and has some POV slant, not the least because it doesn't follow up on the published conclusions from the university's investigation. I'll make some efforts to correct. When I first ran across it I didn't have time to clean it up appropriately, so just reverted what was a clear POV slant on the report. The NYT article itself is questionable as to the authors' motives considering other reports [1] [2] of athletes in similar courses at other universities. Why was it not a broad article on academic issues in college athletics rather than being focused exclusively on Auburn? AUTiger ʃ talk/work 18:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Name
editThis article should be titled Carnell Williams. "Cadillac Williams" is a common nickname, but it not "always" used in his reference.Doctorindy 14:31, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:092505 WILLIAMS 11.jpg
editImage:092505 WILLIAMS 11.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Article name change: Cadillac-Carnell
editI think we should change the article from his nickname "Cadillac Williams" to his legal name of "Carnell Williams". We could absolutely mention his nickname in the other parts of the article, but this is supposed to be like a biography not a fan site. Any one disagree?--Lucky Mitch (talk) 23:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Agree. Other pages on Wiki use the legal name. 174.116.38.15 (talk) 12:27, 13 December 2011 (UTC)