This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Perhaps it would be worth referencing each story individually? The text here seems to show the myth as described in Virgil's Aeneid but we should also consider other representations such as Dionysius, Livy, Propertius and Ovid. P. Hardie believes that Virgil is responsible for innovations in his story: the transformation of Cacus into a super-human, demonic and hellish monster, with the resulting allusions to Gigantomachy but also the allegorical effect of the whole episode upon the portrayal of Augustus. For these reasons, Virgil's representation probably isn't the best one to describe here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.138.120 (talk) 18:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
