This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I simply don't understand how this could have been a CSD article. --Mr Accountable (talk) 07:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
@Mr Accountable: Sometimes people are way too quick to label something as advertising when the article's creator has done their best to be neutral. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Was CPCS once the consulting arm of Canadian Pacific? If so, that would be worth mentioning. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Many potentially notable companies are members of the Canadian Association of Railway Suppliers. (Of course, being a member of the association or being listed in its directory doesn't make a company notable, but if a company's listing in the Railway Suppliers Directory looks interesting, you can then try to find references to establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
