Talk:CFL draft

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:CFL draft/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

A very short and simple, though well-written, article. Stub is the right ranking. TFCforever (talk)

Last edited at 02:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 10:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Canadian College Draft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130423122530/http://bclions.com/page/history_draft to http://www.bclions.com/page/history_draft
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cfl.ca/CFLNews0104/12_history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Potential page moves

FWIW a heads up on a recently closed RFC, which may effect the naming of this and related pages. GoodDay (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

(copied from my other comment for visibility) As the RfC closer, I can confirm that the close applies only to pages related to the NFL draft and has no impact on other leagues or sports. There was some discussion of them at the RfC, but was unrelated to the RfC question or the consensus reached. Anyone trying to use it to bypass discussion on other articles is not interpreting the close correctly. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 17:16, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 27 March 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky (talk) 11:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

---

• CFL Draft → CFL draft
• 1970 CFL Draft → 1970 CFL draft
• 1971 CFL Draft → 1971 CFL draft
• 1972 CFL Draft → 1972 CFL draft
• 1973 CFL Draft → 1973 CFL draft
• 1974 CFL Draft → 1974 CFL draft
• 1975 CFL Draft → 1975 CFL draft
• 1976 CFL Draft → 1976 CFL draft
• 1977 CFL Draft → 1977 CFL draft
• 1978 CFL Draft → 1978 CFL draft
• 1979 CFL Draft → 1979 CFL draft
• 1980 CFL Draft → 1980 CFL draft
• 1981 CFL Draft → 1981 CFL draft
• 1982 CFL Draft → 1982 CFL draft
• 1983 CFL Draft → 1983 CFL draft
• 1984 CFL Draft → 1984 CFL draft
• 1985 CFL Draft → 1985 CFL draft
• 1986 CFL Draft → 1986 CFL draft
• 1987 CFL Draft → 1987 CFL draft
• 1988 CFL Draft → 1988 CFL draft
• 1989 CFL Draft → 1989 CFL draft
• 1990 CFL Draft → 1990 CFL draft
• 1991 CFL Draft → 1991 CFL draft
• 1992 CFL Draft → 1992 CFL draft
• 1993 CFL Draft → 1993 CFL draft
• 1994 CFL Draft → 1994 CFL draft
• 1995 CFL Draft → 1995 CFL draft
• 1996 CFL Draft → 1996 CFL draft
• 1997 CFL Draft → 1997 CFL draft
• 1998 CFL Draft → 1998 CFL draft
• 1999 CFL Draft → 1999 CFL draft
• 2000 CFL Draft → 2000 CFL draft
• 2001 CFL Draft → 2001 CFL draft
• 2002 CFL Draft → 2002 CFL draft
• 2003 CFL Draft → 2003 CFL draft
• 2004 CFL Draft → 2004 CFL draft
• 2005 CFL Draft → 2005 CFL draft
• 2006 CFL Draft → 2006 CFL draft
• 2007 CFL Draft → 2007 CFL draft
• 2008 CFL Draft → 2008 CFL draft
• 2009 CFL Draft → 2009 CFL draft
• 2010 CFL Draft → 2010 CFL draft
• 2011 CFL Draft → 2011 CFL draft
• 2012 CFL Draft → 2012 CFL draft
• 2013 CFL Draft → 2013 CFL draft
• 2014 CFL Draft → 2014 CFL draft
• 2015 CFL Draft → 2015 CFL draft
• 2016 CFL Draft → 2016 CFL draft
• 2017 CFL Draft → 2017 CFL draft
• 2018 CFL Draft → 2018 CFL draft
• 2019 CFL Draft → 2019 CFL draft
• 2019 CFL European Draft → 2019 CFL European draft
• 2019 CFL–LFA Draft → 2019 CFL–LFA draft
• 2020 CFL Draft → 2020 CFL draft
• 2021 CFL Draft → 2021 CFL draft
• 2021 CFL Global Draft → 2021 CFL global draft
• 2022 CFL Draft → 2022 CFL draft
• 2022 CFL Global Draft → 2022 CFL global draft
• 2023 CFL Draft → 2023 CFL draft
• 2023 CFL Global Draft → 2023 CFL global draft
• 2024 CFL Draft → 2024 CFL draft
• 2024 CFL Global Draft → 2024 CFL global draft
• 2025 CFL Draft → 2025 CFL draft

– Commonly lowercase in sources, like other leagues' drafts. Dicklyon (talk) 04:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Natg 19 (talk) 01:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

• Data are scarce, but lowercase draft dominates. Dicklyon (talk) 08:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

  Ngrams without any meaningful context, especially for words that are often used in every day language, are not useful for discussions such as these, there's far too much noise to the data. Especially when usage such as "draft picks" would be lowercased. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

  Neither "CFL draft pick" nor "CFL draft picks" shows any ngrams data,[1] so the concern about "CFL draft" being comingled with other terms is unsupported. —Bagumba (talk) 07:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

  "lowercase dominates" – er, not really, not even close. Looking at all the first google results, each of which are uppercase unless noted:

  College football teams, such as BSU, Holy Cross, Fresno State

  Calgary Herald

  Sports Illustrated

  3DownNation (one of the most prominent CFL-specific publications)

  Sportsnet

  Sporting News

  The Leader-Post

  The Football Database

  Calgary Sun

  Global News

  CBC (finally, one that's lowercase)

  American Football International

  The Province

  The Queen's Journal

  That's not even close to "lowercase dominates". BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

  You already started with some of the moves? How many times...? BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

  No, I haven't moved any yet (I earlier downcased the plural Canadian College Drafts (1956–1969), and now that's been reverted for who knows what reason). For sources, books are more reliable, and more independent, typically, than random web pages. See lots of lowercase in books. See summary stats. Dicklyon (talk) 22:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

  Hm? You seemed to think that websites were important when it was the USFL, when the numbers were more in your favor, now not? And these aren't "random websites", either, these are some of the most reliable sources when it comes to this topic (Calgary Herald, Sportsnet, Sporting News, Leader Post, Calgary Sun - all very prominent publications on the topic); conversely, I don't think random books are better than that (especially since we don't know how reliable all of them are, whether they're written by knowledgable people, etc.). Also, the Canadian College Draft is absolutely relevant to the CFL Draft (its direct predecessor); you know better than to lowercase sports draft articles without discussion... BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

  The only place I pointed to news was in the 2022/2023 case, where there are no book stats. The CFL Draft is old enough to have fair representation in books. Dicklyon (talk) 04:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

  Some news sources use lowercase draft, too:

  Winnipeg Sun

  LethbridgeNews Now

  Times Colonist

  Global News/The Canadian Press

  Regina Leader-Post

  Saanich News

  SaltWire

  SI.com

  Saskatoon StarPhoenix

  Times Colonist

  Meath Chronicle

  3DownNation

  TSN

  So clearly not "consistently capitalized" in sources. Dicklyon (talk) 08:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

  And then there's also in the uppercase camp:

  Ottawa Sun

  U Sports teams

  U Sports itself

  CKRM

  CFL News Hub

  Kingston Whig-Herald

  The Ubyssey

  KMPH Fox News and other local stations

  Pittsburgh Sports Now

  Northern Star

  Western Gazette

  CTV News

  KSL Sports

  Sherbrooke Record

  Barrhaven Independent

  CTV News Kitchener

  247Sports

  Providence Journal

  Wetumpka Herald

  Bemidji Pioneer

  Rivals.com

  SB Nation

  A good majority of sources appear to be uppercase. Also, it seems the Leader Post, SI and 3DownNation usually use uppercase, although there are a few with downcasing. TSN and Global have some uppercase also. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

• Comment - My goodness, this RM needs more input. GoodDay (talk) 22:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
• Support – With no evidence of near-unanimous capitalization, WP:LOWERCASE clearly says "don't use capitalization unnecessarily". —Joeyconnick (talk) 16:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Where does it say the requirement is "near-unanimous capitalization"? I don't think using what the league, all relevant teams and a good majority of sources say is using "capitalization unnecessarily". BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
• Support: We've gone through this sort of thing many times before for similar topics. Sources are mixed; let's use lowercase. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 02:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
• Support Not capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable source per MOS:CAPS. The guideline also says: Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization. Collins defines proper noun as a noun...that is arbitrarily used to denote a particular person, place, or thing without regard to any descriptive meaning the word or phrase may have, as Lincoln, Beth, Pittsburgh[2] A reader seeing CFL Draft does not attach a different meaning to it than when they see CFL draft. It's purely a description in basic English, not any sort of proper noun like Grey Cup (vs a plain grey cup) or White House (vs white house). Capitalization is not necessary for a reader to understand the meaning here.—Bagumba (talk) 16:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
• Support. Per Bagumba and prior discussions. JoelleJay (talk) 16:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.