Requested move 11 March 2018

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 01:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


– Per WP:COMMONNAME. He is better recognised as C418 than by his real name, by sources and media. Lazz_R 01:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Regarding recent reversion about "Rosenfeld possibly no longer contributing to Minecraft"

edit

My edit was reverted because it was "not from a reliable source" -- however, the secondary source I referenced includes direct quotes by Rosenfeld on his own Discord server, thus there was a primary source wrapped inside this secondary source. Rosenfeld's direct quotes include: "listen guys it hurts me as well" "I'm not happy about it but so long and thanks for all the fish" (These were brought up in a conversation about why Rosenfeld was not contributing any new compositions to the game). He also said "yeah, conflict of interest definitely" and "maybe if we stack the lawyers in a pyramid something will happen". @0xDeadbeef please advise as to why such direct quotes are not worthy of documentation on this page and Music of Minecraft. I can see how perhaps including the conjecture about the true nature of the legal issues as being not as reliable, if nothing because it is from a single source, but the non conjecture portion of the addition seems very much noteworthy and definitely reliable (primary source). LMK. Samuuurai (talk) 08:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

YouTube is not a generally reliable source, see WP:RSPYT. I personally believe that SalC1 is pretty reliable for their content about Minecraft, but a consensus for this should be reached at WP:RSN first. 0xDeadbeef 08:26, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply