Talk:C.C. Chapman

Latest comment: 2 years ago by TipsyElephant in topic Merger proposal
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on C.C. Chapman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was an uncontroversial merge. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I propose merging Accident Hash into C.C. Chapman. I think the content in Accident Hash can easily be explained in the context of C.C. Chapman's page, and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems. I also don't think that Accident Hash passes WP:GNG and I believe this is a preferable WP:ATD. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.