Talk:Byzantine silk

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Byzantine silk article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Textile Arts B‑class High‑importance

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile ArtsTemplate:WikiProject Textile ArtsTextile Arts articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Byzantine silk appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 December 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Byzantine silk designs include the tree of life, winged horses, and imaginary beasts, along with fashionable images of hunting and quadrigas (pictured)?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/December.

Wikipedia

New article edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Please feel free to expand this article and change/add to the images. Things I know are missing (need to find citations):

Y ~~Persistence of Persian/Sassanid textile designs in Byzantine fabrics.~~
Impact on design in Western Europe.
Y ~~Possible influence on Opus Anglicanum~~

- PKM (talk) 07:27, 28 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wow, great article, well done! I'll try to add some info on the main production centres (Thebes & Constantinople) and the structure of the state silk monopoly as soon as I find the time, but otherwise it is very comprehensive... Constantine ✍ 12:54, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Something on production, guilds, etc., would be a great addition. - PKM (talk) 18:47, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Random notes on more things to add edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't want to lose track of these notes when I get busy after the holidays!

Production edit

Byzantium was never able to produce all the raw silk it needed domestically; exports were prohibited; discuss sources of imports. (In AM's PDF)
No direct archaeological evidence for looms, but we can deduce much from the surviving fabrics and from written sources. Drawlooms. "Elephant" silk from tomb of Charlemagne required 1440 changes. Changes in loom technology indicated by introduction of lampas.

Developments edit

Color palette shifts with monochrome lampas (see AM in Jenkins on this pp. 349). Also more dyestuffs.
Figured silks with patterns of saints disappeared during Iconoclasm, and never came back in woven fabrics although these themes did return in tapestry and embroidery. So when did saints appear? Add to paragraph on designs & look for image.

Impact Woven textiles edit

Byzantine impact eastward as well - paired warps in the Byzantine style appear in Central Asia.

-PKM (talk) 02:46, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Structure edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Retitled a couple of sections (I was never happy with "Impact" anyway), primarily to deal with documentation that the Gunthertuch is a woven tapestry rather than an embroidery. Added that info as well after consulation with Johnbod. - PKM (talk) 01:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic