Talk:Bytemark

reference 5 for BigV

WRT reference 5 for BigV, it's probably worth linking directly to the Design And Implementation pdf linked in the article, and mentioning that it's KVM now, not UML, which drives Bytemark's virtualisation. Regularfry (talk) 13:20, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Declaring an interest

Hello - I'm currently employed at Bytemark. I'm going to restrict my edits on this page to pure factual edits at best, or otherwise suggest them here.

Please help me out by letting me know (gently!) if I contravene best practice or whether there's any factual information that I can supply. I've reviewed all the guidance in this area and I've been a Wikipedia editor for around a decade on-and-off, so I hope to be useful rather than a shill. Technicalfault (talk) 14:48, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bytemark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140901031015/http://www.documentfoundation.org:80/supporters to http://www.documentfoundation.org/supporters/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141011075003/http://2013.stateofthemap.org:80/blog/personalised-mugs-bytemark/ to http://2013.stateofthemap.org/blog/personalised-mugs-bytemark/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 11 November 2016 (UTC)