Talk:Bystander effect (radiobiology)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bystander effect (radiobiology). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120323170444/http://lowdose.energy.gov/radiation_bystandereffects.aspx to http://lowdose.energy.gov/radiation_bystandereffects.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Comparison with the abscopal effect
editThe penultimate paragraph states "Note that the bystander effect is not the same as the abscopal effect". According to PMID 28723894 "The radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE) refers to a unique process in which factors released by irradiated cells or tissues exert effects on other parts of the animal not exposed to radiation..."
How is this different from the bystander effect? Or, am I being dense (I write this on a Friday afternoon after a very busy week)?
Perhaps if the effect is beneficial (e.g. kills other tumours) the effect is abscopal, whereas if the effect is detrimental (e.g. makes your hair fall out) the effect is bystander.
Can someone help?