Talk:Butch Woolfolk

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleButch Woolfolk has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 13, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 12, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that college football running back Butch Woolfolk was named MVP of both the Rose Bowl and the Bluebonnet Bowl in the same year?


Untitled

edit

Can we please stop all the University of Michigan football articles.68.198.123.217 (talk) 22:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Auto peer review

edit

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 04:29, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Second Son

edit

I am trying to confirm if his second son's name is Jarrel (mentioned here: http://www.chron.com/CDA/archives/archive.mpl?id=2001_3333046)--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 00:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA review

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)

Some prose tweaks and it needs a better transition between the NFL career and the Career after football sections

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    Prose tweaks and some flow issues, needs n dashes and persondata
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    a couple places need citation
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Details:

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.Ealdgyth | Talk 16:06, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Looks great! Passing it now. Ealdgyth | Talk 16:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Butch Woolfolk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Butch Woolfolk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply