Talk:Business support system

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

OSS and BSS edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In "TeleManagement Forum" paragraph there is this sentence: "As shown in the figure the BSS supports the more Customer Facing domains. Whereas the OSS supports the traditional Resource and Resource Facing Service domains." There is however no figure in the article and no reference to which figure the sentence refers. I think that quite often terms OSS/BSS are used interchangeably. 2007-09-09

Agreed. There was a section both the OSS and BSS pages referring to the TMF introducing "a communications domain model that provides the basis for clarifying the distinction between OSS and BSS systems". I can't find that work. The TMF's Telecom Application Map says "The term OSS is used to cover all the systems that are used by a telecom operator, sometimes referred to as OSS and BSS". I've therefore deleted the bit about the communications domain. --Phil Holmes (talk) 11:33, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.41.98 (talk) 05:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Vendors edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We need a list of vendors of these systems - currently the vendor profiles are not linked to anything. We do need to be fair and equitable though. I suggest that we add vendors with profiles and that editors add any that are missed off the list.SandrinaHatman (talk) 10:13, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic