Talk:Burnt Yates

For this article to be good, more people need to contribute. At the very least this article should be a Start Class and possibly class C. This article could be class A with everyone contributing.--Tubs uk (talk) 16:48, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

To do list

This article needs pictures to make it nicer and to give people a good idea of what Burnt Yates looks like (obviously).

Finding out the population of Burnt Yates would make the article better.--Tubs uk (talk) 16:48, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Statistics for Civil Parish

The stats for the civil parish of Clint cum Hamlets (of which Burnt Yates is a part) are to be found here.This might help to expand some sections of the article.--Harkey (talk) 15:07, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

First thoughts

• All sections need to be expanded. See Lealholm for example.
• The infobox Template:Infobox UK place needs more entries adding.
• The article needs less conjecture and more facts.

--Harkey (talk) 15:17, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

More thoughts - remove the distances table as adds nothing to article, the section on Employment is total speculation and so needs references or removing. Talking of Leeds is stretching it a bit and should be removed, what about much more local locations which are more relevant to the place. Keith D (talk) 18:33, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Burnt Yates. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/inspection-reports/find-inspection-report/provider/ELS/121626

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:53, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burnt Yates. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071014153645/http://www.ramblersyorkshire.org/walks_feb07.html to http://www.ramblersyorkshire.org/walks_feb07.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 11 November 2016 (UTC)