Talk:Buridan's bridge

A fact from Buridan's bridge appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 February 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a humorous solution for the Buridan's bridge sophism is that Plato should let Socrates cross the bridge and then throw him into the river on the other side?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/February.

Wikipedia

Philosophy: Logic / Medieval Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic
	Medieval philosophy

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is not a proper paradox even if we must assume that being thrown in the water and being allowed to cross the bridge are mutually exclusive (so throwing someone in the water involves not letting them cross the bridge and letting them cross the bridge means they won't be thrown in the water). If this assumption doesn't apply, there's a simple solution which involves doing both.

But even when we make that assumption, there is still no paradox here to resolve: if Plato doesn't throw Socrates into the water, Plato lied about that, and if Plato does throw him into the water, he lied about letting him cross the bridge. If he doesn't do either, he lied about both. The only issue is for Plato, because his actions will determine what he lied about (and whether Socrates lied too). So, not a paradox; merely a dilemma. Djvyd (talk) 22:15, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

What's so difficult?

"Socrates' response puts Plato in a difficult situation" - What's so difficult? All Socrates has to do is speak the truth to cross. He can say one of a million truths and then cross.

Add topic