Talk:Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Rocketry

An IP user with an obvious interest in amateur rocketry, 97.93.90.46 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), added a large amount of material based entirely on primary sources.[1] He argues that the BATFE exceeds its remit by regulating non-explosive rocket fuel. However it isn't the place of Wikipedia to advance original arguments. Because the material violates WP:OR and WP:NPOV, I am reverting his edits. If similar material, based on secondary sources, can be presented in a neutral way, then I have no objection to it. Felsic2 (talk) 01:30, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

I've added a summary of the issue.[2]. I couldn't find many secondary sources about the outcome, so I'm sure it can be improved. Felsic2 (talk) 16:30, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Criticism section?

It occurs to me whenever I read about events that the ATF are involved in, there's sometimes an absurd amount of violence disproportionate to other agencies, and a lot of controversy surrounding them. So it would make sense that there are probably journalists who would criticise them. Not to mention that alcohol, tobacco and firearms are all actually legal in the US, which, again, I'd imagine would garnish some criticism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.227.83.117 (talk) 19:47, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Rocketry

An IP user with an obvious interest in amateur rocketry, 97.93.90.46 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), added a large amount of material based entirely on primary sources.[3] He argues that the BATFE exceeds its remit by regulating non-explosive rocket fuel. However it isn't the place of Wikipedia to advance original arguments. Because the material violates WP:OR and WP:NPOV, I am reverting his edits. If similar material, based on secondary sources, can be presented in a neutral way, then I have no objection to it. Felsic2 (talk) 01:30, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

I've added a summary of the issue.[4]. I couldn't find many secondary sources about the outcome, so I'm sure it can be improved. Felsic2 (talk) 16:30, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Criticism section?

It occurs to me whenever I read about events that the ATF are involved in, there's sometimes an absurd amount of violence disproportionate to other agencies, and a lot of controversy surrounding them. So it would make sense that there are probably journalists who would criticise them. Not to mention that alcohol, tobacco and firearms are all actually legal in the US, which, again, I'd imagine would garnish some criticism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.227.83.117 (talk) 19:47, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Illustration of ATF Badge is of a Plaque Based on a Chinese Fake

These fake ATF badges are available on eBay from vendors in China, which are being sold as "obsolete," "cosplay" or "novelty items." The give-away in this case is the lettering on the seal, which reads "Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosive" ("Explosive" is erroneously singular). I suggest we remove the illustration in the article until a genuine illustration can be found. Compare the seal on the fake badge to the apparently genuine seal for the Bureau. I am not including a link to eBay, as I do not wish to promote the sale of counterfeit badges. However, if you click on my reference below, you will see another example of this fake ATF badge design (downloaded from an eBay ad). Taz Hood (talk) 14:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Taz Hood (talk) 15:14, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130922171440/http://www.atf.gov/publications/factsheets/factsheet-ffl-facts-and-figures.html to http://www.atf.gov/publications/factsheets/factsheet-ffl-facts-and-figures.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120728164426/http://www.atf.gov/about/history/atf-from-1789-1998.html to http://www.atf.gov/about/history/atf-from-1789-1998.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091203000711/http://www.atf.gov/publications/general/snapshots/atf-snapshot-2006.html to http://www.atf.gov/publications/general/snapshots/atf-snapshot-2006.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101110191553/http://www.atf.gov/publications/general/snapshots/atf-snapshot-2008.html to http://www.atf.gov/publications/general/snapshots/atf-snapshot-2008.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110703035905/http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/local_news/investigations/weapons-linked-to-controversial-atf-strategy-found-in-valley-crimes to http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/local_news/investigations/weapons-linked-to-controversial-atf-strategy-found-in-valley-crimes

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 27 July 2017 (UTC)