| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bunny (webcomic) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article Deletion edit
Keep: Ok, I put in too many links the first time. Fixed now, please keep article. ~ Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 06:08, 2005 July 15 (UTC)
Keep: Article needs work to be more encyclopedic, but a good stub would be a nice addition as the comic in question is moderately popular. JeroenHoek 09:12, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
Wikilinks to non-existing articles edit
My apologies for removing the wikilinks to the non-existing Wiki article on "Lem" Cyberskull, but I don't think he is notable enough to warrant a wiki article. The webcomic Bunny is pretty well known, and most of the people visiting the site remember that the artist is called Lem, but if you take away "Bunny" then he isn't anymore famous than you or me. Of course, if someone thinks differently and creates a great artcile on Lem (artist), then by all means, link him, but in all other cases a red wikilink should only be used when it is to be expected that that article should be part of Wikipedia, which isn't the case here. I'm afraid that an article on Lem won't survive a VfD. JeroenHoek 20:43, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Gender Section edit
The Gender section seems to be entirely speculative. Additionally, the paragraph states that many of the gender-related comics were "created by people other than the strip's creator" and were therefore probably not canon. I therefore believe that it should be removed, per WP:Verify. I'll leave it for a few days, and if there haven't been any objections here I'll remove it. --Beezhive 03:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
References edit
I think that the Discworld reference may have to be removed. Please refer to the Buttered Cat Paradox. It can't have just been Ponder Stibbons who mentioned it, though the idea is appealing. Hairyshoe 06:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. I don't see evidence to believe it originated solely from Terry Pratchett. Removing section. LadyPhi 16:38, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
someone should make a section about the family tree on comic 1015, of the date october 9, 2007. i would if i knew how 24.16.240.55 03:58, 11 October 2007 (UTC)