Talk:Bullying in the military
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bullying in the military. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061209065131/http://www.deepcutreview.org.uk:80/Home/home/Home to http://www.deepcutreview.org.uk/Home/home/Home
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 26 June 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. The proposed title would narrow the scope of the article. Hazing is an initiation ritual for new recruits which may involve bullying, while bullying in the military may continue years after initiation. wbm1058 (talk) 16:09, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Bullying in the military → Hazing in the military – Hazing is more commonly used in this context; perhaps there's a difference in British vs American English here, alas, most works are using hazing. GBooks count is 2:1, as is GScholar. Two dedicated books on this topic use hazing, not bullying: Kirsten M. Keller; Miriam Matthews; Kimberly Curry Hall (12 August 2015). Hazing in the U.S. Armed Forces: Recommendations for Hazing Prevention Policy and Practice. Rand Corporation. pp. 49–. ISBN 978-0-8330-9105-5. {{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help), Oliver Thompson (December 2016). Hazing in the Military: Persistence, Policies, Recommendations. Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated. ISBN 978-1-5361-0081-5.. I guess there is also the option to use both terms, as in bullying and hazing in the military (consider [1], [2]). Thoughts on the best title? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:58, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support עם ישראל חי (talk) 14:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- This meaningless WP:VOTE should be disregarded. Zarcadia (talk) 18:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- hazing is the correct term this page would probably be better of if it was deleted entirely as it doesn't really have any information עם ישראל חי (talk) 19:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose. Probably a WP:ENGVAR issue. "Hazing" is not a common word in British English. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:55, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Hazing is an "initiation ceremony" (according to it's own article) so doesn't cover the scope of this article. Zarcadia (talk) 18:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Opposte per Necrothesp and due to the fact that it would limit the scope of this article. Those two books are both written from an American standpoint and specifically refer to the US military, so it's clear why they would use the term "hazing". It desperately needs more worldwide information, and I can already see how this could shift the article's tone away from the concept and closer towards random examples. Prinsgezinde (talk) 21:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.